I am a DVD addict without enough time to get through the pile of unwatched discs that never seems to shrink. I have just completed my second Master’s degree, leaving behind seven years of studying politics to study film academically and written my Dissertation about the place of the family in The Exorcist, Rosemary's Baby and The Omen. Although I enjoy films from just about every genre, my favourite has been horror since I saw The Exorcist at a midnight showing in 1998 when it was re-released and have enjoyed finding out more and more different aspects to the genre and buying more and more DVDs and Blu-ray Discs.
Blu-ray Discs
Red Cliff
Evil Dead II
The Army of Darkness
Hot Fuzz
Apocalypto
Tell No One
Children of Men
Frost/Nixon
The Midnight Meat Train
Son of Rambow
The Exorcism of Emily Rose
The Day the Earth Stood Still (1951)
Che Part One
Che Part Two
The Bourne Identity
The Bourne Supremacy
The Bourne Ultimatum
Toy Story
Toy Story 2
Up
DVD
Deadwood: The Ultimate Collection
Lisa & the Devil
House of Exorcism
Bay of Blood
Baron Blood
Kidnapped
Roy Colt and Winchester Jack
5 Dolls for an August Moon
Four Times That Night
Lust, Caution
3 Games to Glory II: The 2003 New England Patriots
3 Games to Glory III: The 2004 New England Patriots
My DVD and Blu-ray Collection
MyReviewer
DVD Reviewer
Cult Labs Forums
Rant – Chuck Palahniuk
Books of Blood 4-6 – Clive Barker
Fear and Loathing on the Campaign Trail '72 – Hunter S. Thompson
We Can Remember It For You Wholesale – Philip K Dick
The Day of the Triffids – John Wyndham
Haunted – Chuck Palahniuk
The Audacity of Hype – Armando Iannucci
–
Panasonic TH42PZ80 Full HD Plasma Screen
PS3 Blu-ray Player (Region B)
Sony DVP-NS718 DVD Player (Multi Region)
Toshiba D-R1SB DVD Recorder (Multi Region)
Virgin Media V+ Cable Box
Onkyo TX-SR606 AV Amplifier
Sony CDP-337ESD CD Player
Eltax Liberty 7.0 Surround Speakers
Eltax Atomic A-6.2 Subwoofer

It will be interesting to see how the change in voting format effects anything and whether we will find out what would have won if the previous system was still in place. If the changes passed you by, basically the Academy went back to the original system and expanded the Best Picture category from 5 to 10 nominees and introduced the alternative vote system so members don’t just vote for the best, but rank the nominees in order.
Enough verbal diarrhoea, on with the picks
BEST MOTION PICTURE OF THE YEAR
It seems that this category will be dominated by James Cameron’s $500 million 3D extravaganza Avatar and Kathryn Bigelow’s small budget Iraq war drama The Hurt Locker. Though An Education, District 9 and Up were superb films, I can’t see any of those winning. Unless the big two completely split voters down the middle and let something else slip in and take people by surprise (such as Quentin Tarantino’s overlong, indulgent and baggy Inglorious Basterds), I think that Avatar will get the award, despite The Hurt Locker being the best film of the year.
Prediction: Avatar
BEST ACHIEVEMENT IN DIRECTING
This will, like the Best Picture Oscar, be a battle between former husband and wife James Cameron and Kathryn Bigelow. Though I thought Lee Daniels did a fantastic job with Precious, I can’t see the Academy rewarding him, nor Jason Reitman for the better than average Up in the Air. I don’t know why Tarantino is even in this category as Basterds didn’t work as a coherent whole despite the individual chapters being very well constructed. What Cameron did with Avatar was extraordinary and it was a film with a great ‘wow’ factor but very little else. In terms of taking a tough subject and making a tense and utterly gripping film out of it, Bigelow is the best in this category and should, and probably will, be recognised as such.
Prediction: Kathryn Bigelow
BEST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTOR IN A LEADING ROLE
Somehow George Clooney doing that thing that George Clooney does was considered superior acting to Andy Serkis’ amazing embodiment of Ian Dury and Sam Rockwell proving what a tremendous screen actor he is in Moon – even Sharlto Copley should feel duly miffed that he was snubbed. The rest of the nominations don’t really have a hope of preventing Jeff Bridges from winning with his wonderfully grizzled singer in Crazy Heart as his best performance in years and easily the best in this group. I’d love to comment on Colin Firth in A Single Man but it’s been sadly overlooked by the multiplexes, just as he will be tonight.
Prediction: Jeff Bridges
BEST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTRESS IN A LEADING ROLE
The big question is: will Meryl Streep join Katharine Hepburn as the only other actor with three Oscars? Her performance in Julie & Julia was mesmeric but I preferred Carey Mulligan in An Education, a turn that belied her lack of experience and would personally love to see her win. I think, as with Jeff Bridges, that the tide is firmly with Sandra Bullock who has made a career out of sub-par performances and it’s ironic that she will probably pick up a Razzie and an Oscar in the same weekend! It shows that she can really pick rubbish but, give her a good director, script and group of actors to play against, she has the acting chops to deliver.
Prediction: Sandra Bullock
BEST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTOR IN A SUPPORTING ROLE
Quite an easy one this, with the only good thing about Inglorious Basterds being Christoph Waltz’ extremely impressive, multi-lingual portrayal of a chilling SS officer. Matt Damon was the best actor in Invictus and, with Morgan Freeman approaching his best, that’s quite a thing to do but neither he nor Stanley Tucci will get the nod.
Prediction: Christoph Waltz
BEST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTRESS IN A SUPPORTING ROLE
A surprisingly weak field in this category, with two actresses from the same film (Vera Farmiga and Anna Kendrick from Up in the Air) but the clear winner, from a film boasting outstanding performances by the lead and supporting actresses, Precious was given great weight (pardon the pun) with a heartwrenchingly sadistic portrayal of a woman by Mo’nique. Given that the last thing I saw her in was the utterly abysmal Phat Girlz, I was stunned by how good she was and will be amazed if she doesn’t win.
Prediction: Mo’nique
BEST WRITING, SCREENPLAY WRITTEN DIRECTLY FOR THE SCREEN
One of the tougher categories to pick a winner from, there are lots of worthy winners and I feel it will come down to The Hurt Locker or Inglorious Basterds. There may be a surprise with Up winning, but it will come down to whether The Hurt Locker begins a sweep like Slumdog Millionaire did last year.
Prediction: The Hurt Locker
BEST WRITING, SCREENPLAY BASED ON MATERIAL PREVIOUSLY PRODUCED OR PUBLISHED
Another excellent list of films with some of the finest writing I’ve witnessed all year (but then that’s the idea!) and it is hard to see which way this one is going to go. The Brits are well represented, with An Education and In The Loop but I have a feeling that Up in the Air will take it. Really you could give it to any of these five films and think you have a worthy winner.
Prediction: Up in the Air
BEST ANIMATED FEATURE FILM OF THE YEAR
It’s going to be Up, the film is nominated for Best Picture, just as WALL-E should have been, and it is a superb film. Good to see Disney back making cell animation films with the well made, cast and hugely enjoyable The Princess and the Frog, but when Pixar releases a film, it wins awards!
Prediction: Up
BEST FOREIGN LANGUAGE FILM OF THE YEAR
The only one of these I’ve seen is A Prophet which won awards at Cannes, the BAFTAs and, most recently, the Cesars and it’s hard to look beyond that.
Prediction: A Prophet
Posted by David Beckett
Not too bad - only three wrong and I wasn't sure about Foreign Language because I've only seen one! I'm very pleased that the Hurt Locker won best picture, as I was last year when Slumdog beat Benjamin Button.
For many people, a love of film and cinema was developed from a very young age with weekly (or even more frequent) trips to the local picture house with parents or other relatives. Others may have picked up that habit from friends and relatives at home with VHS or Betamax. I managed to get to the age of 14 without owning a single videotape apart from a blank VHS on which my parents had recorded Monty Python and the Holy Grail which I watched frequently and took to a mate’s house every so often when he had a sleep over.
This all changed when I had an accident which saw me spent 19 months in four different hospitals, with TV and video comprising most of my entertainment. Age didn’t seem to matter much and I remember watching Highlander, Robocop and The Terminator upon my return to Britain. (I had the accident in France.)
The next hospital had a Sky box which fed the TVs which were next to each bed and there was a cupboard full of videos that could go into the communal VCR and be available for anyone to watch. Sharing the ward with people older than me also allowed me to watch the low budget and generally rubbish skin flicks that Sky put on late at night – sleep is a rare commodity in hospital. They also knew more films than I did and requested to watch a variety of movies and I was all too happy to join them.
After five months of working my way through the videos at Hexham, I moved to the other side of the country for an assessment which would turn into a stay of just over a year. This was where the habit well and truly kicked in. With hours of nothing to do and plenty of time by myself, the supply of films from the OT department, other patients and even doctors and nurses gave me much to help pass the time.
A weekly ritual also developed where Friday nights involved my dad coming over, a take away, usually a calzone, and a rental video. Titles I remember include Twelve Monkeys, Fargo, Se7en and Trainspotting. Of course, that wasn’t all and, when a doctor lent me Pulp Fiction which I thought was great, I then borrowed Reservoir Dogs from another patient.
Eventually I came home just in time to catch the DVD wave and, with a lot of free time and disposable income, I was well on my way to becoming a DVD addict when James Ferman’s tenure at the BBFC ended and the shops filled with previously banned films.
I haven’t looked back since.
Posted by David Beckett
I clicked on your 'My Collection' link and found the collection too vast to browse! There are more than 2000 dvd's listed there. (I have 1500 and thought I was the most addicted man on the planet!). Have you viewed them all? I order more than I view, which means the pending pile grows ever higher! Having said that, movies and quality TV are certainly enriching. This must have been a god-send during those hospital bound months and years.
Interesting read David, i was disapointed when it ended! Could have read another 10,000 words
I remember the first effects film had on me. I was 8 years old and i remember there used to be this car that used to pull up on the street and a guy used to rent films from the back of his car - i always remember runing up to it and picking films out and looking at the images, 'EVIL DEAD', 'THE HILLS HAVE EYES' 'CHILDS PLAY' and loads of other video nasties. My parents used to rent them and i remember me and my sister sitting down to watch Evil Dead - she was plauged by nightmares while i thought WOW this is ace. One of the stand out moments in my life was the same year when i saw a VHS of a film called Dawn of the Dead - i secretly watched it in my parents room and that was the beginning of it, i was hooked on horror films - i put a quote at the start of the george romero book - 'thanks to my parents for letting me watch horror films as a kid' cause if it wasnt for that i wouldnt love movies so much. Now ask me what i did with my first girlfriend and i cant remember anything. All those movie memories have stuck with me
Of the 2000+ discs in my collection, I have just under 50 that are unwatched, which I think isn't bad. Of those 50, I've seen most of them before on a different format - either renting before buying, on TV or a double dip from DVD to Blu-ray.
I am currently writing a sequel called 'Why Horror?' which is similar to Curtis' point but obviously I wasn't into films at that age. I remember one of the Star Wars films (Return of the Jedi I think) being on TV when I was young and my Mum was outside chatting to a neighbour. I got bored and went to see what they were chatting about!
To get through that many DVDs deserves a medal! About 30% of my collection is unwatched (lol). I buy films then never seem to watch them (stuff like The Green Mile, Mystic River, The Fountain, Mash etc).
I look forward to reading the 'Why Horror?' article. I remember being a strange 8 year old (lol). While other kids were watching stuff like Star Wars (which i didnt watch until i was 15) and playing with Ghostbuster toys i used to stay in the house and watch horror films (lol). I think its because my parents were liberal about what i watched i tended to go with the videos that had the 'grab factor' cover. I remember the old Evil Dead cover being a particularly good attension grabber and the Dawn of the Dead sniper-rifle cover with flyboy in the centre. Another reason is that i used to have a babysister between the ages of 7-12 as my folks didnt finish work till 6 and she let me do anything i wanted. One of the films that did freak me out was The Shining. It one on one of those old Warner Bros big rental cases and my parents had a top loading video player - i used to hate the blood coming out of the lift and the little girls as Danny turns the corner on his bike.
I managed to get to the grand old age of nineteen before I bought my first videotape - mainly because they only invented the buggers around that time
Up to that point I'd been a staunch movie fan - regularly going to what back then really was "the pictures" - the 3000+ seater Odeon. I even had my own 8mm projector array and a collection of digest prints of movies including Star Wars, Raiders of the Lost Ark, Barbarella, The Poseidon Adventure and others. For me, the advent of videotape was a revelation - access to hundreds of movies that I'd seen and loved in the past and the introduction of thousands of new favourites. Videotape was still nothing compared to DVD, though. Through DVD I've got copies of virtually every fondly-remembered movie I can remember, and for me the passion is simply having a copy rather than actually watching it.
My name's Mark and I'm a film addict...
"...and for me the passion is simply having a copy rather than actually watching it."
Perfectly put Mark. Now I feel a lot less guilty!
And sometimes not just owning one copy will do!
I was looking at my shelves only yesterday and asking myself why I had so much stuff, I now have the answer. Cheers, Mark...
You know you have a problem when you have more than one version of a release. He says looking at his three copies of Total Recall, two Shawshank Redemptions, two each of the Eastwood Spaghetti Westerns, two of The Frighteners, three of Dark City, two (or five of Bladerunner), three of Kamikaze Girls...
Mother...
Do you have the American Dark City with the Roger Ebert commentary? Its one of my favourates.
That's one of them for sure. Although I must admit that I didn't appreciate the Ebert track as much as most. I also have a slight resentment for this disc. After I ordered it, but before it was delivered, is when the UK R2 Special Edition was announced. Something that happened to me far too often.
Early on pre-Internet addiction, I bought the original non-anamorphic Bad Boys, only for the Collector's Edition to be released the next week. Thankfully, the shop did a refund for me.
You know you have a problem when you have more than one version of a release.
Boy, do I have a problem...
Actually, I've only multi-dipped a small number of titles -
Stardust x3 (R2, R1 for extras missing on R2 and Blu-ray)
Wizard of Oz x4 (R1, R2, R2 3 discer, Blu-ray box o' crap)
Return of the Pink Panther x3 (R2 p&s, R1 OAR, R2 OAR)
Flash Gordon x3 (R2 LBX, R2 OAR, R2 SE)
The list goes on but you can see a pattern - striving for the best copy but retaining the old copy as a backup.
I'm not completely nuts. Maybe 99.999%...
What?!! No Universal? The veritable mothers of the genre as a popular mainstream art-form? And no Hammer, Amicus or Vipco? That's the trouble with lists. Everyone's will be different. I would extend this to a top 20!!
I've never been much of a modern horror fan. Universal Horrors and Hammer Horrors - that's a different story.
I was thinking - you could have a top ten Frankenstein movies, or Dracula movies they've been done so much.
As I said in the intro, it was a nightmare narrowing all those great horror films down to just ten and loads that I love missed out. This started as a top twenty and was cut down to ten. The great films that Universal released (Tod Browning's Dracula and James Whale's Frankenstein and Bride of Frankenstein) are fantastic groundbreaking films but some had to miss out and they were some of the many that were cut.
To do a top twenty, I'd have to start with about fifty films and then gradually whittle it down, removing thirty from the list. You'd see some Universal and Hammer - probably Frankenstein and the 1958 Dracula - but there are so many good horrors that even those would have competition in the 20-11 range.
'Dracula' vs 'The Texas Chainsaw Massacre'? You may be on your own there David. ![]()
That said, I agree with many of your choices and only recently watched 'The Excorcist' again and enjoyed it tremendously once it got going. Certainly not as scary as I remember it in the early seventies!
That's what this top ten is all about - I'd rather watch The Texas Chain Saw Massacre than Dracula. Not an opinion I imagine many others share, but it's my opinion and that's all that matters!
Exactly, but isn't the point of doing one of these lists to encourage debate of your selection?
Precisely, I would have hated it if no one had commented! Already thinking about another top ten - but what? Western, Sci-fi (I don't watch Star Trek and dislike Star Wars!), Epic, Fantasy?
Comedy is always subjective and I'm sure will generate some lively debate!
It's always fun to do a top ten movies you love but you're sure nobody else will like - and find out other people like them too. Of course, you may find out your suspicions are confirmed.
What! Me chipping in to a horror movies thread, at this time of day, with my reputation?
See there are movies that creep me out, put the chills up me, but I don't know if they'd be horrors exactly. I'd have The Omen, The Hitcher, The Fly (remake), Jacob's Ladder, The first Alien movie, Gremlins?
Must admit that Halloween did creep me out as a kid.
I'd definitely class all of those, with the exception of Gremlins, as horror films. Gremlins is comedy/horror but I was going for just plain horror. I guess you could put The Fly and Alien as horror/sci-fi but I consider them horror films.
See, for me, The Hitcher and Jacob's Ladder are more psychological thrillers, and the Omen has those biblical overtones that in my view sort of make it Horror+. Same goes for The Exorcist
I'd also be willing to add Spielberg's Duel and Jaws to the list, for requiring a change of underwear. Other unlikely titles, not necessarily because they are Horror, but because they terrified me, are Beneath The Planet of the Apes (the bit with the masks, and Taylor's Final Solution), and By Dawn's Early Light. Cold War nightmare.
Comedy horror - now there's an underrated genre. I keep hearing the term bandied about with modern horror movies but I frequently fail to see what people find amusing about them. Don't get me wrong, I can find splatstick hysterically funny, but some movies just don't work for me.
Now on the other hand, pictures like The Cat and the Canary (Bob Hope), The Ghost Breakers, Arsenic and Old Lace - insanely funny but wonderfully atmospheric. Guess they just don't make 'em like that any more.
This is what I love about horror. There is so much debate about what is and isn't a horror film, and where a psychological thriller becomes a horror and the difference between a comedy horror and a horror comedy just depends on the balance and your own tolerance to horror.
There are arguments for considering something like Se7en as a horror and Fight Club as a updating of the Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde story, a fine gothic horror.
I would never consider Arsenic and Old Lace as a comedy horror as it's more a screwball comedy with a macabe subplot than something like Shaun of the Dead, but then times and tastes change.